Comments on: The Power of Sockets and Dynamic Proxies http://jonasboner.com/2007/07/27/the-power-of-sockets-and-dynamic-proxies/ Down To The Bone Thu, 16 Oct 2008 06:54:38 +0000 http://wordpress.org/?v=2.0.2 by: werutzb http://jonasboner.com/2007/07/27/the-power-of-sockets-and-dynamic-proxies/#comment-65029 Wed, 08 Oct 2008 03:09:57 +0000 http://jonasboner.com/2007/07/27/the-power-of-sockets-and-dynamic-proxies/#comment-65029 <p>Hi!</p> <p>I want to extend my SQL knowledge. I red really many SQL resources and would like to read more about SQL for my position as mysql database manager.</p> <p>What can you recommend?</p> <p>Thanks, Werutz</p> Hi!

I want to extend my SQL knowledge. I red really many SQL resources and would like to read more about SQL for my position as mysql database manager.

What can you recommend?

Thanks, Werutz

]]> by: Curt Cox http://jonasboner.com/2007/07/27/the-power-of-sockets-and-dynamic-proxies/#comment-14401 Fri, 27 Jul 2007 23:09:06 +0000 http://jonasboner.com/2007/07/27/the-power-of-sockets-and-dynamic-proxies/#comment-14401 <p>Thanks for the sharing the code and writing it up.</p> <p>At first glance, this reminds me of The cajo Project. https://cajo.dev.java.net/</p> <p>PS -- RMI doesn't have a "stub and skeleton mess" any more.</p> Thanks for the sharing the code and writing it up.

At first glance, this reminds me of The cajo Project. https://cajo.dev.java.net/

PS — RMI doesn’t have a “stub and skeleton mess” any more.

]]> by: Jonas http://jonasboner.com/2007/07/27/the-power-of-sockets-and-dynamic-proxies/#comment-14399 Fri, 27 Jul 2007 19:24:38 +0000 http://jonasboner.com/2007/07/27/the-power-of-sockets-and-dynamic-proxies/#comment-14399 <p>Steve, Thanks for your feedback.</p> <blockquote> The implementation looks clean and straightforward, but some of the terminology seems a little off. Isn’t RemoteProxy actually a proxy factory? </blockquote> <p>True, it is more of a factory than an actual proxy. I guess I just wanted to mimic the java.lang.reflect.Proxy.newInstance, which is also more of a factory than an actual proxy. </p> <blockquote> The approach also seems to be invasive from a POJO perspective since the RemoteProxy must be exposed in the business object interfaces (versus supporting automatic proxying of specified return value types). </blockquote> <p>True. It can definitely be improved. That wouldn't be too hard to add I guess. I don't know why I never got to that. Thanks.</p> Steve, Thanks for your feedback.

The implementation looks clean and straightforward, but some of the terminology seems a little off. Isn’t RemoteProxy actually a proxy factory?

True, it is more of a factory than an actual proxy. I guess I just wanted to mimic the java.lang.reflect.Proxy.newInstance, which is also more of a factory than an actual proxy.

The approach also seems to be invasive from a POJO perspective since the RemoteProxy must be exposed in the business object interfaces (versus supporting automatic proxying of specified return value types).

True. It can definitely be improved. That wouldn’t be too hard to add I guess. I don’t know why I never got to that. Thanks.

]]> by: Steve Bate http://jonasboner.com/2007/07/27/the-power-of-sockets-and-dynamic-proxies/#comment-14398 Fri, 27 Jul 2007 19:15:11 +0000 http://jonasboner.com/2007/07/27/the-power-of-sockets-and-dynamic-proxies/#comment-14398 <p>The implementation looks clean and straightforward, but some of the terminology seems a little off. Isn't RemoteProxy actually a proxy factory? The approach also seems to be invasive from a POJO perspective since the RemoteProxy must be exposed in the business object interfaces (versus supporting automatic proxying of specified return value types).</p> The implementation looks clean and straightforward, but some of the terminology seems a little off. Isn’t RemoteProxy actually a proxy factory? The approach also seems to be invasive from a POJO perspective since the RemoteProxy must be exposed in the business object interfaces (versus supporting automatic proxying of specified return value types).

]]>