Comments on: Distributed Continuations for Java: RIFE and Open Terracotta http://jonasboner.com/2007/04/16/distributed-continuations-for-java-rife-and-open-terracotta/ Down To The Bone Thu, 16 Oct 2008 07:05:05 +0000 http://wordpress.org/?v=2.0.2 by: Jonas http://jonasboner.com/2007/04/16/distributed-continuations-for-java-rife-and-open-terracotta/#comment-10761 Tue, 17 Apr 2007 06:26:30 +0000 http://jonasboner.com/2007/04/16/distributed-continuations-for-java-rife-and-open-terracotta/#comment-10761 <p>Also, we at Terracotta are not endorsing or favoring any specific framework (even though Geert is a Terracotta employee now). We are spending a lot of effort integrating with various 'competing' framework such as: Struts, Struts 2, Wicket, RIFE, Spring Web Flow, Lucene, Hibernate etc., more to come (as well as application servers). Essentially we want to integrate with all OSS (and commercial) tools and frameworks that developers out there are using and are deploying on, on a day to day basis.</p> Also, we at Terracotta are not endorsing or favoring any specific framework (even though Geert is a Terracotta employee now). We are spending a lot of effort integrating with various ‘competing’ framework such as: Struts, Struts 2, Wicket, RIFE, Spring Web Flow, Lucene, Hibernate etc., more to come (as well as application servers). Essentially we want to integrate with all OSS (and commercial) tools and frameworks that developers out there are using and are deploying on, on a day to day basis.

]]> by: Jonas http://jonasboner.com/2007/04/16/distributed-continuations-for-java-rife-and-open-terracotta/#comment-10759 Tue, 17 Apr 2007 06:10:24 +0000 http://jonasboner.com/2007/04/16/distributed-continuations-for-java-rife-and-open-terracotta/#comment-10759 <p>Right Matt. </p> <p>Even though I love the RIFE web framework I don't think it is likely that it will become the # 1 choice for future Java web deployments (even though I think that it has such unique approach that it deserves more much attention). What I meant to say was that I hope that RIFE's web continuations (together with Terracotta) will become the preferred way of writing stateful and conversational/workflow based web applications in Java. We are already seeing this starting to happen - Struts 2 using it etc. </p> <p>However that is not what I wrote. Sorry for the confusion and thanks for the correction.</p> Right Matt.

Even though I love the RIFE web framework I don’t think it is likely that it will become the # 1 choice for future Java web deployments (even though I think that it has such unique approach that it deserves more much attention). What I meant to say was that I hope that RIFE’s web continuations (together with Terracotta) will become the preferred way of writing stateful and conversational/workflow based web applications in Java. We are already seeing this starting to happen - Struts 2 using it etc.

However that is not what I wrote. Sorry for the confusion and thanks for the correction.

]]> by: Matt Raible http://jonasboner.com/2007/04/16/distributed-continuations-for-java-rife-and-open-terracotta/#comment-10732 Mon, 16 Apr 2007 14:54:47 +0000 http://jonasboner.com/2007/04/16/distributed-continuations-for-java-rife-and-open-terracotta/#comment-10732 <p>I think it's a stretch to say RIFE will become the #1 web framework of choice for future enterprise Java web deployments. It's been around for a long time and it's still not on the radar of most companies and most Java developers haven't heard of it. Then again, maybe you guys are planning some sort of media blitz to change that. ;-)</p> I think it’s a stretch to say RIFE will become the #1 web framework of choice for future enterprise Java web deployments. It’s been around for a long time and it’s still not on the radar of most companies and most Java developers haven’t heard of it. Then again, maybe you guys are planning some sort of media blitz to change that. ;-)

]]>