<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><!-- generator="wordpress/2.0.2" -->
<rss version="2.0" 
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/">
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Thoughts On Parenthood In The Software Industry</title>
	<link>http://jonasboner.com/2006/04/18/thoughts-on-parenthood-in-the-software-industry/</link>
	<description>Down To The Bone</description>
	<pubDate>Sun, 12 Oct 2008 14:45:05 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.0.2</generator>

	<item>
		<title>by: Tim McIntyre</title>
		<link>http://jonasboner.com/2006/04/18/thoughts-on-parenthood-in-the-software-industry/#comment-3643</link>
		<pubDate>Thu, 04 May 2006 00:26:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://jonasboner.com/2006/04/18/thoughts-on-parenthood-in-the-software-industry/#comment-3643</guid>
					<description>&lt;p&gt;To veer off on a tangent for a moment, I think the really interesting question that you've asked is, &quot;is this an accurate metaphor?&quot;&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;No metaphor, by definition, can be completely accurate.  The beauty of any metaphor is that, by definition, it has to break down somewhere.  Otherwise, it wouldn't be a metaphor. :)&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>To veer off on a tangent for a moment, I think the really interesting question that you&#8217;ve asked is, &#8220;is this an accurate metaphor?&#8221;</p>

<p>No metaphor, by definition, can be completely accurate.  The beauty of any metaphor is that, by definition, it has to break down somewhere.  Otherwise, it wouldn&#8217;t be a metaphor. <img src='http://jonasboner.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: Jonas</title>
		<link>http://jonasboner.com/2006/04/18/thoughts-on-parenthood-in-the-software-industry/#comment-3610</link>
		<pubDate>Wed, 19 Apr 2006 14:31:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://jonasboner.com/2006/04/18/thoughts-on-parenthood-in-the-software-industry/#comment-3610</guid>
					<description>&lt;p&gt;I disagree, &lt;/p&gt;

&lt;ol&gt;
&lt;li&gt;&lt;p&gt;The father only plants half the idea.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;/li&gt;
&lt;li&gt;&lt;p&gt;The father has no control over (or even visibility into) how the idea is developed.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;/li&gt;
&lt;li&gt;&lt;p&gt;Unfortunately, way too often, noone knows who the father is, not even the mother...&lt;/p&gt;&lt;/li&gt;
&lt;/ol&gt;

&lt;p&gt;As you can see, the metaphore is inherently broken.&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I disagree, </p>

<ol>
<li><p>The father only plants half the idea.</p></li>
<li><p>The father has no control over (or even visibility into) how the idea is developed.</p></li>
<li><p>Unfortunately, way too often, noone knows who the father is, not even the mother&#8230;</p></li>
</ol>

<p>As you can see, the metaphore is inherently broken.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: Alex</title>
		<link>http://jonasboner.com/2006/04/18/thoughts-on-parenthood-in-the-software-industry/#comment-3609</link>
		<pubDate>Wed, 19 Apr 2006 11:58:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://jonasboner.com/2006/04/18/thoughts-on-parenthood-in-the-software-industry/#comment-3609</guid>
					<description>&lt;p&gt;The father is the right term, as obviously someone else (a team usually) is needed to make the thing happen from the initial sparkling of the idea by the father.&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The father is the right term, as obviously someone else (a team usually) is needed to make the thing happen from the initial sparkling of the idea by the father.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: Pascal</title>
		<link>http://jonasboner.com/2006/04/18/thoughts-on-parenthood-in-the-software-industry/#comment-3607</link>
		<pubDate>Tue, 18 Apr 2006 21:41:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://jonasboner.com/2006/04/18/thoughts-on-parenthood-in-the-software-industry/#comment-3607</guid>
					<description>&lt;p&gt;According to your definitions I would in fact put both terms to use: the father being the main initiator and the mother being the team implementing the vision. In Eclipse terms, that woumd be: the PMC and the committers.&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>According to your definitions I would in fact put both terms to use: the father being the main initiator and the mother being the team implementing the vision. In Eclipse terms, that woumd be: the PMC and the committers.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: Kevin Ward</title>
		<link>http://jonasboner.com/2006/04/18/thoughts-on-parenthood-in-the-software-industry/#comment-3606</link>
		<pubDate>Tue, 18 Apr 2006 15:38:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://jonasboner.com/2006/04/18/thoughts-on-parenthood-in-the-software-industry/#comment-3606</guid>
					<description>&lt;p&gt;How about &quot;The Progenitor of...&quot;?&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>How about &#8220;The Progenitor of&#8230;&#8221;?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
</channel>
</rss>
